Ford Mustang 2017 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 5.2 | 2.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 - 760 HP | 275 - 650 HP | |
| Torque: | 475 - 847 NM | 365 - 868 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 5.8 seconds | 4.2 - 5.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 16.8 | 9.2 - 15.7 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.35 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mustang is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 257 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Ford Mustang has 151 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`132 kg | ~ 2`120 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`688 kg | ~ 1`630 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 444 kg | ~ 490 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 000 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |