Ford Mustang 2017 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 5.0 | 2.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 317 - 421 HP | 275 - 650 HP | |
| Torque: | 432 - 530 NM | 365 - 868 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 5.8 seconds | 4.2 - 5.7 seconds | |
| In general, Chevrolet Camaro are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford Mustang. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 13.5 | 9.2 - 15.7 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.35 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 257 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Ford Mustang has 151 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`690 | ~ 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 600 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |