Ford Mustang 2017 vs BMW 4 series 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Mustang is available only with rear wheel drive, while BMW 4 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 - 5.2 (petrol) | 1.5 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. BMW 4 series is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 - 760 HP | 136 - 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 475 - 847 NM | 220 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 5.8 seconds | 4.7 - 9.2 seconds | |
| In general, Ford Mustang are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than BMW 4 series. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 16.8 | 4.0 - 7.4 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 6.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 4 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 130 - 145 mm (5.1 - 5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 4 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mustang is 16 cm longer than the BMW 4 series, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 445 litres | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.4 metres more than that of the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`132 kg | ~ 2`051 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`688 kg | ~ 1`548 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 444 kg | ~ 503 kg | |
| Ford Mustang load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than BMW 4 series. Therefore, BMW 4 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |