Ford Mustang 1994 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Mustang is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Eclipse can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 - 4.6 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 305 HP | 94 - 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 - 407 NM | 142 - 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 6.8 - 9.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.3 | 8.4 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Eclipse. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 24 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 13 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 289 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Eclipse. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |