Ford Mustang 1994 vs Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Mustang is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mitsubishi 3000 GT is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Mustang is available with rear wheel drive, while Mitsubishi 3000 GT can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 - 4.6 | 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 305 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 - 407 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi 3000 GT are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford Mustang. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.3 | 11.1 - 12.4 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi 3000 GT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.28 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
| |