Ford Mustang 1994 vs BMW 5 series 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 3.8 - 4.6 (petrol) | 2.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 305 HP | 115 - 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 - 407 NM | 190 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 6.2 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.3 | 5.9 - 12.2 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.44 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 16 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.7 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`077 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |