Ford Mustang 1994 vs Toyota Celica 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Mustang is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Mustang is available only with rear wheel drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 - 4.6 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 305 HP | 116 - 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 - 407 NM | 154 - 302 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 6.1 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.3 | 7.9 - 9.5 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 20 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 283 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |