Ford Mustang 1994 vs Ford Mustang 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.8 - 4.6 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 305 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 - 407 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.3 | 12.0 | |
|
Ford Mustang 1994 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang 1999. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.35 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mustang 1994 is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang 1999, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
| |