Ford Mustang 1994 vs Chrysler Stratus 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Mustang is available with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler Stratus can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 - 4.6 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 305 HP | 131 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 - 407 NM | 174 - 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.3 | 8.2 - 10.7 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Stratus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.37 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 13 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chrysler Stratus, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |