Ford Mustang 1999 vs Honda Accord 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Mustang is available with rear wheel drive, while Honda Accord can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 140 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7.9 - 9.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 5.4 - 9.4 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.44 m | |
| Ford Mustang and Honda Accord are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 459 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda Accord, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Honda Accord has
| |