Ford Mustang 1999 vs Ford Cougar 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Mustang is available with rear wheel drive, while Ford Cougar can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 130 - 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 176 - 234 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7.8 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 8.3 - 10.2 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Cougar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.32 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Cougar, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 930 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Cougar, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`799 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Cougar has
| |