Ford Mustang 1999 vs Chevrolet Impala 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
| Ford Mustang is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chevrolet Impala is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Mustang is available with rear wheel drive, while Chevrolet Impala can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 | 3.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 177 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 278 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 9.2 - 10.2 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Impala. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.46 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 42 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |