Ford Mustang 1999 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 3.8 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.5 - 8.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 11.7 - 12.4 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller, but higher. Ford Mustang is 25 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |