Ford Mustang 2005 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
Ford Mustang is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chrysler 300C is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ford Mustang is available only with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler 300C can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 4.0 - 5.4 (petrol) | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 212 - 540 HP | 193 - 425 HP | |
Torque: | 325 - 691 NM | 257 - 570 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 7 seconds | 5 - 11 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 - 13.0 | 8.1 - 14.0 | |
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300C. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.48 m | |
Ford Mustang is smaller. Ford Mustang is 25 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 504 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 154 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`269 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 800 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |