Ford Mustang 2005 vs Dodge Avenger 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Mustang is available only with rear wheel drive, while Dodge Avenger can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.4 | 2.0 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 - 540 HP | 156 - 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 - 691 NM | 190 - 232 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 7 seconds | 11 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 - 13.0 | 7.8 - 8.9 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Avenger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.50 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 8 cm shorter than the Dodge Avenger, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Dodge Avenger has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 100 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Avenger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Avenger has
| |