Ford Mustang 2005 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.4 | 3.6 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 - 540 HP | 323 - 432 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 - 691 NM | 278 - 569 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 7 seconds | 4.7 - 6.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 - 13.0 | 10.9 - 14.1 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Mustang is 7 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 364 litres | |
| Ford Mustang has 14 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
| |