Ford Mustang 2009 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Mustang is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Eclipse has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Mustang is available with rear wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Eclipse can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 5.4 | 2.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 - 550 HP | 162 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | 220 - 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 - 13.9 | 9.7 - 11.6 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Eclipse. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 20 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 379 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 445 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Eclipse, which means Ford Mustang can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`856 | ~ 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |