Ford Mustang 2009 vs Ford Mustang 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Mustang
2009 - 2012
Ford Mustang
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual Manual/Automatic
Ford Mustang 2009 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Ford Mustang 2005 has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Engines: 5.44.0 - 5.4

Performance

Power: 540 - 550 HP212 - 540 HP
Torque: 691 NM325 - 691 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5 seconds4.5 - 7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.1 - 13.910.4 - 13.0
Ford Mustang 2009 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang 2005.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.77 m
Width: 1.96 m1.88 m
Height: 1.40 m1.39 m
Ford Mustang 2009 is larger.
Ford Mustang 2009 is 1 cm longer than the Ford Mustang 2005, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang 2009 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 379 litres350 litres
Ford Mustang 2009 has more luggage capacity.
Ford Mustang 2009 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang 2005.
Turning diameter: 11 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`856no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 11 60011 600
Pros and Cons: Ford Mustang has
  • manual gearbox only
  • roomier boot
Ford Mustang has
  • both manual and automatic
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv