Ford Mustang 2009 vs Dodge Charger 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Mustang is available only with rear wheel drive, while Dodge Charger can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 5.4 | 2.7 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 - 550 HP | 193 - 432 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | 258 - 569 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 4.9 - 6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 - 13.9 | 9.8 - 14.7 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 30 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 379 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 81 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.9 metres less than that of the Dodge Charger, which means Ford Mustang can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`856 | ~ 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |