Ford Mustang 2009 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 5.4 | 3.6 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 - 550 HP | 312 - 426 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | 377 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 - 13.9 | 11.1 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mustang is 6 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 379 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mustang has 59 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`856 | ~ 1`737 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |