Ford Mustang 2014 vs Kia Cerato 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Mustang is available with rear wheel drive, while Kia Cerato can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 - 5.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 309 - 426 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 - 529 NM | 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.9 - 7.2 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mustang is 28 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 14 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 433 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mustang has 25 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato. This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`254 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Cerato has
| |