Ford Maverick 1993 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.9 seconds | 17.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Ford Maverick engine produces 24 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 71 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 12.4 | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Maverick consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Ford Maverick over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
| Ford Maverick is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Maverick is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Ford Maverick can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`580 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |