Ford Maverick 1993 vs Suzuki Vitara 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 124 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 197 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Ford Maverick engine produces 12 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, but torque is 25 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 10.6 | |
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Maverick consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.12 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
Ford Maverick is larger. Ford Maverick is 46 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 263 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 438 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Maverick is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Ford Maverick can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`580 | 1`875 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |