Ford Maverick 1993 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1994

 
Ford Maverick
1993 - 1996
Land Rover Range Rover
1994 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol4.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 124 HP226 HP
Torque: 197 NM377 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds9.9 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Maverick engine produces 102 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.416.2
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Maverick consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Ford Maverick over 15,000 km in a year you can save 720 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.71 m
Width: 1.74 m1.89 m
Height: 1.81 m1.82 m
Ford Maverick is smaller.
Ford Maverick is 13 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Maverick is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Maverick is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Ford Maverick can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5803`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 12004000
Pros and Cons: Ford Maverick has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv