Ford Maverick 1996 vs Subaru Forester 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Ford Maverick and Subaru Forester have the same engine power, but Ford Maverick torque is 94 NM more than Subaru Forester. Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.0 | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Maverick consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Ford Maverick is larger. Ford Maverick is 21 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Maverick is 0.6 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Ford Maverick can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Subaru Forester has
| |