Ford Maverick 1996 vs Subaru Forester 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Ford Maverick engine produces 7 HP less power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 7 NM more than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 9.0 | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Maverick consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Ford Maverick is larger. Ford Maverick is 21 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Maverick is 0.6 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Ford Maverick can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Subaru Forester has
| |