Ford Maverick 1996 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Ford Maverick engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 9 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 10.1 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Maverick consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Ford Maverick is larger. Ford Maverick is 13 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Maverick is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Ford Maverick can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |