Ford Maverick 2000 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 229 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 291 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Ford Maverick engine produces 32 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Due to the lower power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 10.6 | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Maverick consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Maverick is 8 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Maverick is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1951 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`145 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |