Ford Maverick 2000 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003

 
Ford Maverick
2000 - 2007
Nissan X-Trail
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 197 HP165 HP
Torque: 265 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds11.1 seconds
Ford Maverick is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Maverick engine produces 32 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.89.6
Real fuel consumption: 12.7 l/100km11.5 l/100km
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Maverick consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 480 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Maverick consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 480 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
660 km on highway750 km on highway
480 km with real consumption520 km with real consumption
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch.

Nissan X-Trail 2003: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.51 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.72 m1.68 m
Ford Maverick is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 985 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1841 litres
Ford Maverick has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Ford Maverick has 575 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1452`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 20002600
Pros and Cons: Ford Maverick has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Nissan X-Trail has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv