Ford Maverick 2004 vs Subaru Forester 2005

 
Ford Maverick
2004 - 2007
Subaru Forester
2005 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP158 HP
Torque: 200 NM186 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds9.7 seconds
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Maverick engine produces 8 HP less power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 14 NM more than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.19.3
Real fuel consumption: 10.9 l/100km9.8 l/100km
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Maverick consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 270 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Maverick consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
560 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption
Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.48 m
Width: 1.83 m1.74 m
Height: 1.76 m1.59 m
Ford Maverick is 4 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 17 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 985 litres387 litres
Ford Maverick has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Ford Maverick has 598 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. The Subaru Forester may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9781`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 20003800
Pros and Cons: Ford Maverick has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Subaru Forester has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv