Ford Maverick 2004 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000

 
Ford Maverick
2004 - 2007
Mitsubishi Pajero
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.3 Petrol3.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP202 HP
Torque: 200 NM318 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds11.7 seconds
Ford Maverick engine produces 52 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 118 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.114.2
Real fuel consumption: 10.9 l/100km15.7 l/100km
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Maverick consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Ford Maverick over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Maverick consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres71 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle500 km in combined cycle
720 km on highway630 km on highway
560 km with real consumption450 km with real consumption
Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.28 m
Width: 1.83 m1.88 m
Height: 1.76 m1.84 m
Ford Maverick is 16 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Maverick is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 985 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight: 1`978 kg2`800 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 24003800
Pros and Cons: Ford Maverick has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv