Ford Maverick 2004 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Ford Maverick engine produces 97 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 129 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 13.4 | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Maverick consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Ford Maverick over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.85 m | |
| Ford Maverick is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Maverick is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |