Ford Maverick 2004 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford Maverick) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Ford Maverick engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 173 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Maverick consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Maverick consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.85 m | |
| Ford Maverick is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Maverick is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1790 litres | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage capacity. Ford Maverick has 770 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`978 kg | 2`800 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |