Ford Maverick 2004 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Ford Maverick engine produces 27 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Despite less power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 12.4 | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Maverick consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Ford Maverick over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Maverick is larger. Ford Maverick is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |