Ford Maverick 2004 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000

 
Ford Maverick
2004 - 2007
Land Rover Freelander
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP117 HP
Torque: 200 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds12.6 seconds
Ford Maverick is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Maverick engine produces 33 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.110.4
Real fuel consumption: 10.9 l/100km10.5 l/100km
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Maverick consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Maverick consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
720 km on highway690 km on highway
560 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.38 m
Width: 1.83 m1.80 m
Height: 1.76 m1.76 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Maverick is 6 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 985 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data11.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9782`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 20001800
Pros and Cons: Ford Maverick has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Land Rover Freelander has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv