Ford Maverick 2004 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Ford Maverick engine produces 22 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Maverick consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Maverick consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch. Honda CR-V 1997: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Ford Maverick is 9 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Maverick has 610 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |