Ford Maverick 2004 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Maverick engine produces 12 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 10.1 | |
| Ford Maverick consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch. Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Ford Maverick is 10 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Maverick has 460 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |