Ford Maverick 2004 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003

 
Ford Maverick
2004 - 2007
Nissan X-Trail
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP165 HP
Torque: 200 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds9.9 seconds
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Maverick engine produces 15 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.19.4
Real fuel consumption: 10.9 l/100km11.1 l/100km
By specification Ford Maverick consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 255 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Maverick consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
720 km on highway780 km on highway
560 km with real consumption540 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch.

Nissan X-Trail 2003: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating.

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.51 m
Width: 1.83 m1.76 m
Height: 1.76 m1.68 m
Ford Maverick is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 985 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1841 litres
Ford Maverick has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Ford Maverick has 575 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9782`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 22002600
Pros and Cons: Ford Maverick has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Nissan X-Trail has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv