Ford Maverick 2004 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Ford Maverick engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Maverick consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Maverick consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.62 m | |
| Ford Maverick is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Maverick has 583 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |