Ford Maverick 2000 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Ford Maverick engine produces 26 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Maverick consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Maverick consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 510 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch. Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Ford Maverick is 25 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Maverick is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Maverick has 458 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |