Ford Maverick 2000 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 124 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 175 NM | 192 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Ford Maverick engine produces 16 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Maverick consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Maverick consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
510 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch. Nissan X-Trail 2003: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.39 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
Ford Maverick is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | 410 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
Ford Maverick has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Maverick has 575 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |