Ford Maverick 2000 vs Mazda Tribute 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Ford Maverick and Mazda Tribute have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Tribute is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Maverick consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Maverick consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 510 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda Tribute gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Maverick and Mazda Tribute are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2245 litres | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage capacity. Ford Maverick has 617 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |