Ford Maverick 1993 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Maverick is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Pajero has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.7 | 2.4 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 - 124 HP | 99 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 - 221 NM | 211 - 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 - 19.9 seconds | 10 - 25.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 11.4 | 11.0 - 14.5 | |
|
Ford Maverick petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Ford Maverick equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Ford Maverick is smaller. Ford Maverick is 13 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Maverick is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Maverick is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Ford Maverick can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`580 | ~ 3`073 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |