Ford Maverick 1993 vs Suzuki Vitara 1988
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Ford Maverick is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Suzuki Vitara has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 2.4 - 2.7 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 101 - 124 HP | 71 - 136 HP | |
Torque: | 197 - 221 NM | 127 - 216 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 - 19.9 seconds | 12.5 - 19.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 11.4 | 7.8 - 10.9 | |
Ford Maverick petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Vitara. On average, Ford Maverick equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.02 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
Ford Maverick is larger. Ford Maverick is 57 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Maverick is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 580 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Maverick is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Ford Maverick can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`580 | ~ 1`844 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |