Ford Maverick 2000 vs Mazda Tribute 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 - 197 HP | 124 - 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 265 NM | 175 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.5 seconds | 11.8 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 - 12.8 | 9.4 - 12.8 | |
|
Ford Maverick petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda Tribute. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Maverick and Mazda Tribute are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | 457 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2245 litres | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage capacity. Ford Maverick has 528 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`020 | ~ 1`992 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
| |