Ford Kuga 2008 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Ford Kuga is more dynamic to drive. Ford Kuga engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Thanks to more power Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
By specification Ford Kuga consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
500 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 360'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Kuga engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Audi Q3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Tiguan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Volkswagen Tiguan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1510 litres | |
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 60 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`220 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | average | |
Volkswagen Tiguan has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Kuga, so Volkswagen Tiguan quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 6400 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |