Ford Kuga 2008 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 381 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 29 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 90 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Kuga) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Pajero) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.85 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 290 litres | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity. Ford Kuga has 120 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 15 200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |