Ford Kuga 2008 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 34 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 53 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.85 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 14 000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |