Ford Kuga 2008 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 24 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 68 litres | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is smaller. Ford Kuga is 6 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 755 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 345 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |