Ford Kuga 2008 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 24 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Despite less power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is smaller. Ford Kuga is 6 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 755 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 345 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |