Ford Kuga 2008 vs Jeep Cherokee 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 177 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 460 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Ford Kuga engine produces 41 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 9.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 615 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
1280 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
780 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
Ford Kuga is 5 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Kuga is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 878 litres | |
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 468 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`520 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |