Ford Kuga 2008 vs Jeep Cherokee 2008

 
Ford Kuga
2008 - 2013
Jeep Cherokee
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP177 HP
Torque: 320 NM460 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds10.5 seconds
Ford Kuga engine produces 41 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.39.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km10.8 l/100km
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Kuga consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 615 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1090 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
1280 km on highway890 km on highway
780 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption
Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.49 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.68 m1.74 m
Ford Kuga is 5 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Kuga is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres878 litres
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space.
Ford Kuga has 468 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee.
Turning diameter: no data10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`520
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 72007800
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Jeep Cherokee has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv